Legal Opinion
Deas v. Levitt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 28, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Milonas, J.
Petitioner-appellant Melvin Deas instituted this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in order to challenge the refusal by defendants, Director of the New York City Department of Personnel and the Department of Personnel, to certify him for the position of bus maintainer "A”. It is petitioner’s contention that defendants’ action deprived him of his right to due process under both the Constitutions of the State of New York and the United States and was also arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law. In that connection, a review of the record of the instant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mead v. LevittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Smith v. HudacsNew York Supreme Court · 1993