Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hudacs

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph Harris, J.

Petitioner seeks judgment, pursuant to CPLR article 78, declaring null and void, as arbitrary and capricious, and in violation of due process, respondents’ determination to set off and recoup from petitioner’s lump-sum separation from service entitlement, monies alleged to have been overpaid petitioner due to his submission of allegedly fraudulent time sheets and remanding the matter back for a hearing before the respondents.

In support of the relief requested, the petitioner contends that the Office of General Services (hereinafter referred to as OGS)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. City of New York v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Amerogen v. DonniniNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People Ex Rel. Grannis v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Carlon v. ReganNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API