Legal Opinion

Aranda v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1955No. Sac. 6521PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, seeking recovery for injuries sustained while working as a molder of freight car wheels in a foundry operated by defendant railroad company. He set forth three causes of action in his complaint, alleging that his injuries resulted, first, from negligent' operation of a crane, second, from negligent maintenance of the crane, and, third, from failure to provide him with a safe place to work. The court, sitting without a jury, determined that the federal act was applicable, and the ease then proceeded to trial before a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shelton v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  2. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Ericksen v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Trucco v. Erie Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Gileo v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. GileoSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API