Legal Opinion

(PC) Barrett v. Ciolli

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 4, 2021No. 1:20-cv-01802Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY CURTIS BARRETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01802-NONE-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION 13 v. PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF’S FIFTH AMENDMENT AND EIGHTH 14 A.CIOLLI, et al., AMENDMENT CLAIMS AGAINST DOES 1 THROUGH 10 AND THAT ALL OTHER 15 Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED 16 (ECF No. 9) 17 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 18 TWENTY-ONE DAYS 19 20 Plaintiff Anthony Curtis Barrett (“Plaintiff”) is a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in 21 forma pauperis…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API