Goldsbury v. May
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court.
BY virtue of an execution in favor of Samuel Luckey, against Samuel Perceful, the sheriff seized a mare in the possession of Perceful, and sold her, and the plaintiff in error became the purchaser. The defendant in error brought this action of trover and conversion for the mare, claiming her as his, by virtue of a previous purchase from Perceful. He proved that he had a judgment against Perceful, and on the 3d of October 1819, he agreed to take the mare in discharged *255of so much of the judgment, and executed a receipt for as much as her price amounted to, being fifty…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hamilton v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
3Cited by8 opinions
- Louisville & N. R. v. Paul's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
- Laughlin v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838
- Morton v. Chesapeake Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Ottawa, Oswego & Fox River Valley R. R. v. McMathAppellate Court of Illinois · 1877
- Jarvis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1854
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.