Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Whisenhant

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 8, 1983No. 82-332, 82-333PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These cases arise from the defendant's second conviction under § 13-11-2 (a)(3) for the capital offense of rape-intentional killing of a Mobile woman. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his first conviction because of the prosecution's improper closing argument. Whisenhant v. State,370 So.2d 1080 (Ala.Cr.App., 1979), cert. denied 370 So.2d 1106 (Ala. 1979).

At Whisenhant's second trial, the jury found him guilty, and that same jury, after hearing evidence presented at a sentence hearing, recommended the death penalty. The trial court subsequently imposed that sentence.

The Court of Criminal…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Beck v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Ex Parte WomackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Seibold v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Whisenhant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Whisenhant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Coral v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  3. Ex Parte TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Dill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API