Legal Opinion

Kelly Springfield Tire Co. v. Oakley

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1932No. 3660PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

This action was instituted by plaintiff, Kelly Springfield Tire Company, a corporation, on April 12, 1929, against P. M. Oakley, and the Rogers Service Station, a partnership, and the individual members of the partnership, G. A. Rogers and D. A. Woodard, all of Bien-ville parish, La.

The plaintiff alleges that it sold and delivered to P. M. Oakley, who was conducting an automobile service station, merchandise on which account there was a balance due and unpaid of $1,056.78; that said Oakley had in May or June, 1928, sold in bulk and out of the usual course of business his entire stock of goods…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cox v. Von AhlefeldtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  2. E. B. Hayes Machinery Co. v. EasthamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Key v. BoxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
  4. American Photo Player Co. v. SimonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. B. Rosenberg & Sons, Inc. v. WaguespackSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Homer Electric Shop v. J. D. Waldrip & SonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Monroe Automobile & Supply Co. v. OakleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API