Legal Opinion
Mak Co. v. Smith
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided February 8, 1991No. Civ. No. 90-6007Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
OREN HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the court is a motion for summary judgment by separate defendant Samuel K. Skinner. The motion contends that plaintiffs have failed to exhaust their administrative remedies, and that the complaint fails to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiffs have responded to the motion.
This action involves the construction of a modification of a highway around the Hot Springs, Arkansas area. Plaintiffs previously brought suit in this court against the Arkansas State Highway Commission and Department of Transportation for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Barnhart v. BrinegarDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. PartainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.