Legal Opinion

Smart v. Gates

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 19, 1962No. 5-2705PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

This appeal challenges the validity of Sewer Improvement District No. 1 of Forrest City, Arkansas on the ground that said district embraces lands lying within and outside of the City limits.

Appellants, who are resident property owners of the City, filed a complaint, as a class action, in chancery court against appellees who are the duly appointed Commissioners of said Improvement District. The complaint alleges the said ‘ ‘ District is invalid because a small portion of the District . . . extends beyond the corporate limits of the City . . .” The prayer was that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Butler v. Board of Directors of Fourche Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Bennett v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Cox v. Road Improvement District No. 8Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Berry v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  2. King County Water District No. 54 v. King County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2003
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API