Smart v. Gates
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Paul Ward, Associate Justice.
This appeal challenges the validity of Sewer Improvement District No. 1 of Forrest City, Arkansas on the ground that said district embraces lands lying within and outside of the City limits.
Appellants, who are resident property owners of the City, filed a complaint, as a class action, in chancery court against appellees who are the duly appointed Commissioners of said Improvement District. The complaint alleges the said ‘ ‘ District is invalid because a small portion of the District . . . extends beyond the corporate limits of the City . . .” The prayer was that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Butler v. Board of Directors of Fourche Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Bennett v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Cox v. Road Improvement District No. 8Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
3Cited by13 opinions
- Berry v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- King County Water District No. 54 v. King County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2003
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.