Legal Opinion
Parrish v. Brownlee
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided September 10, 2004No. 5:04-cv-00459PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FLANAGAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs motion to enjoin defendants (collectively, “the Army”) from calling him to active duty. In support of his motion, plaintiff contends that his status as a reservist terminated upon completion of his contractual military service obligation in December 2003, and that the Army’s order to duty was made arbitrarily and capriciously, without due process of law, and in breach of his enlistment contract. On the basis of allegations that a report date had been set for August 27, 2004, the court granted plaintiffs motion for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Qualls v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Garcia v. Frog Island Seafood, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
- Spadone v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Qualls v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005