Appeal of Tennis
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The plaintiff, Kerry Tennis, appeals the decision of the New Hampshire Départment of Employment Security (DES) that he is ineligible for unemployment benefits as of April 1, 2001. Tennis argues that the decision contravenes the statutory scheme for determining unemployment insurance, involves improper administrative rulemaking, and violates due process. We reverse.
Tennis worked for Compaq Computer Corp. (Compaq) for sixteen years. On March 27,2000, Compaq notified him that his “last day of work” would be March '31, 2000. Tennis did not come to work, or perform any employment-related services…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sorensen v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Wellman v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
- Crowley v. FrazierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Milette v. New Hampshire Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1973
3Cited by6 opinions
- ACAS Acquisitions (Precitech) Inc. v. HobertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Coffey’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- In re Juvenile 2002-511-ASupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Appeal of StewartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Rymes Heating Oils, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.