Legal Opinion

Duesterhaus Fertilizer, Inc. v. Capital Crossing Bank (In re Duesterhaus Fertilizer, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided August 28, 2006No. Bankruptcy No. 05-77079; Adversary No. 06-7110PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARY P. GORMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter comes before the Court for decision on the issue of whether the Defendant, Capital Crossing Bank (“Capital Crossing”) has a valid, perfected security interest in certain assets of the Plaintiff, Duesterhaus Fertilizer, Inc. (“Duester-haus”). This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(K) to determine the validity, extent, or priority of a lien.

Duesterhaus is an Iowa corporation with its place of business in Quincy, Illinois. Duesterhaus was a dealer of agricultural chemicals and provided related services to farmers. In 1994…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re BaileyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  2. PA Record Outlet, Inc. v. Mellon Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Southwest Cattlemen's Credit Corp. v. McCloy (In Re McCloy)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Midwest Bank v. Jeana K. ReinboldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. First Midwest Bank v. Reinbold (In re I80 Equip., LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. First Midwest Bank v. Jeana K. ReinboldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API