Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Odegard v. Olson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 22, 1963No. 38,950Published

1ConcurrenceKnutson, Chief Justice

I concur in the result.

Inasmuch as I was the author of the court’s opinion in Youngdale v. Eastvold, 232 Minn. 134, 44 N. W. (2d) 459, which stated among other things that (232 Minn. 139, 44 N. W. [2d] 462) “our courts have no jurisdiction over the election of representatives to congress,” I feel that some explanation of my present views are in order. That statement was taken largely from Williams v. Maas, 198 Minn. 516, 270 N. W. 586, and State ex rel. 25 Voters v. Selvig, 170 Minn. 406, 212 N. W. 604. Read literally, it is too broad a statement.

U. S. Const, art. I, § 4, which provides that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. 25 Voters v. SelvigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Williams v. MaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Youngdale v. EastvoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. McComb, Simpson & Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
  5. Wolff v. LerumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API