Rutenberg v. Philadelphia
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Barnes,
This appeal challenges the constitutionality of the “1937 Magistrates’ Court Act.” This act contains two classes of provisions, those providing for a civil division of the magistrates’ courts, and those relating to their criminal side. We are of opinion that while the sections setting up a so-called civil division are invalid, the sections relating to the criminal jurisdiction of these courts are constitutional and severable from the invalid provisions of the act.
It seems to us that the primary purpose of the act is to effect worthy and needed reforms in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Suermann v. Hadley, Treas. (White)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Minsinger v. RauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Miller v. Belmont Packing & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Stilp v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Life FellowshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. KnoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Rieck-McJunkin Dairy Co. v. Milk Control CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.