Legal Opinion

Housing Authority of Portland v. Comstock

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 27, 1999No. 98F 002785; CA A101517PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*465LANDAU, P. J.

Plaintiff Housing Authority of Portland (HAP) initiated this action to terminate defendant’s residential tenancy under ORS 90.400(3) on the ground that defendant had threatened one of HAP’s employees with bodily injury. The trial court held in favor of HAP, and defendant appeals. Defendant concedes that, under ORS 90.400(3), a tenancy may be terminated for threatening a “landlord,” but argues that the statute does not authorize termination in this case because the person he threatened was merely an employee of the landlord and not the landlord itself. We affirm.

The pertinent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Monaco v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. Oregon City Elks Lodge No. 1189Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Alexander v. U.S. Tank & Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Housing Authority of Portland v. ComstockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API