Legal Opinion

City of Paola v. Wentz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1908No. 15,721PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Miami district court; Winfield H. Sheldon, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*149The opinion of the court was delivered by

MASON, J.:

In order to clear the way for the building of a sidewalk, officers of the city of Paola were about to cut'down three shade trees standing in the street, when Margaret A'. Wentz, the owner of the abutting property, brought a suit to prevent this, and upon final hearing procured an injunction against it, which the city now seeks to have set aside.

The petition set out in general terms that the proposed act was wrongful. The answer alleged that the trees stood within the space designated by the ordinance for sidewalks; that the city was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vanderhurst v. TholckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Mayor of Frostburg v. WinelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  3. Stretch v. Village of CassopolisMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ware v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Grantham v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. Kaw Valley Drainage District v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Piper v. EkernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Collins v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API