McKinlay v. Department of Social & Health Services
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
These cases were consolidated for oral argument and decision because both involve the revocation of the parties' day-care license and present the pivotal issue of who pays for the transcription of the testimonial record from a hearing held before an administrative law judge, i.e., the appellant or the agency. The two trial courts reached opposite results, namely, one held the appellant pays, the other the agency pays. We hold the appellant pays unless there is a determination of the appellant's indigency. The indigency of these appellants not having been determined, these cases are remanded…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portage Bay-Roanoke Park Community Council v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Pryse v. Yakima School District No. 7Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- City of Seattle v. BoulangerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Zoutendyk v. Washington State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Lake Forest Park v. Shorelines Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994