Legal Opinion

State v. York

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 20, 1985No. 6800-1-IIPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, J.

The State appeals the trial court's grant of a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence, CrR 7.6(a)(3), which was a recantation by the 9-year-old victim in an indecent liberties case. The State's primary contention is that the court abused its discretion in granting a new trial upon a finding that defendant's conviction was based "solely" upon the recanting witness' trial testimony, while refusing to find whether the recanting witness had perjured herself at defendant's trial. We hold that the trial court's finding that defendant's conviction was based solely upon the recanted testimony…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Goodman v. Darden, Doman & Stafford AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Moore v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. RolaxWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. PerryMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. MaconWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. MacOnWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. D.T.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API