Legal Opinion
American Rivers, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 16, 2005No. 04-2737, 04-2774, 04-2785, 04-2794, 04-2878 and 04-2994PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, various parties challenge the operation of the Missouri River main stem reservoir system by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“the Corps”) and associated wildlife assessments produced by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”). The district court 1 granted summary judgment to the Corps and FWS and their named individual officers (collectively “the Federal Defendants”) on all claims. For the reasons stated below, we dismiss three claims as moot and affirm the judgment of the district court on all remaining claims.
I.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Jeong Seon Han v. LynchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Florida Key Deer v. PaulisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Cooling Water Intake Structure Coal. v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.