Moore (Devell) v. State

by a preponderance of the evidence, Means v. State, 120 Nev. 1001, 1012,

103 P.3d 25, 33

(2004). First, appellant claimed that his trial counsel had a conflict of interest and was ineffective because counsel worked for the public defender's office and was compensated for expenses at the beginning of the case rather than at the end. Appellant failed to demonstrate that counsel's performance was deficient or that he was prejudiced. That counsel worked for the public defender's office was insufficient to demonstrate an actual conflict of interest and appellant provided no additional facts which…