Legal Opinion

Westminster Securities Corp. v. Uranium Energy Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 19, 2017No. 15 Civ. 4181 (VM) (GWG)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge

Defendants have moved to withdraw their demand for a jury trial.1 Plaintiffs oppose this motion, arguing that the demand cannot be withdrawn without their consent. See Pis. Mem. at 7, 20-21. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is granted and the demand for a jury trial is deemed withdrawn.

I. BACKGROUND

This action seeks to enforce warrants to purchase shares in Concentric Energy Corporation (“CEC”), a corporation that later merged into defendant Uranium Energy Corporation (“UEC”). See Amended *493Complaint, filed July…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Painewebber Incorporated v. Michael J. Bybyk and Joyce O. BybykCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. v. Allegheny Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. H. Walter Hendrix, III and Jean K. HendrixCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. Rosen v. DickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. Great Earth International Franchising Corp. v. Milks DevelopmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative v. Agri SystemsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
  2. TOWN & COUNTRY LINEN CORP. and TOWN & COUNTRY HOLDINGS, INC. v. INGENIOUS DESIGNS LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  3. Textron Aviation Inc. v. William Tsumpes, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
  4. Yousefzadeh v. Hill-Rom, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API