Westminster Securities Corp. v. Uranium Energy Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge
Defendants have moved to withdraw their demand for a jury trial.1 Plaintiffs oppose this motion, arguing that the demand cannot be withdrawn without their consent. See Pis. Mem. at 7, 20-21. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is granted and the demand for a jury trial is deemed withdrawn.
I. BACKGROUND
This action seeks to enforce warrants to purchase shares in Concentric Energy Corporation (“CEC”), a corporation that later merged into defendant Uranium Energy Corporation (“UEC”). See Amended *493Complaint, filed July…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Painewebber Incorporated v. Michael J. Bybyk and Joyce O. BybykCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. v. Allegheny Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. H. Walter Hendrix, III and Jean K. HendrixCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Rosen v. DickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Great Earth International Franchising Corp. v. Milks DevelopmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative v. Agri SystemsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- TOWN & COUNTRY LINEN CORP. and TOWN & COUNTRY HOLDINGS, INC. v. INGENIOUS DESIGNS LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Textron Aviation Inc. v. William Tsumpes, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
- Yousefzadeh v. Hill-Rom, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019