United States v. Two Hundred & Twenty Patented Machines
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
This was an information for forfeiture of machines used by a cigar manufacturer for violations of the’internal revenue law, which was resisted by interveners claiming ownership of such machines.
1Opinion of the Court
McPHERSON. District Judge.
In July, 1899, the firm of William M. Jacobs & Co. was carrying on the business of manufacturing cigars in Lancaster, Pa., and was using for that purpose 220 patented machines known as “suction tables” and “bunching machines.” Upon tlie-lOth day of that month the collector of internal revenue for the Ninth collection district seized these machines, alleging that the firm had violated the laws regulating the- manufacture of cigars. Shortly afterwards the district attorney filed an information in this court seeking to condemn the machines for three separate violations…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. Two Bay MulesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1888
- United States v. Two Barrels WhiskyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. One Saxon AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919
- United States v. MinceyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
- The FrolicDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1906
- United States v. One Bay Horse & One BuggDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.