Legal Opinion

Sauve v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 7, 1940No. 4-6036PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

This action was instituted by Joe Ingram, father and next of kin of Robert Lee Ingram, deceased, for damages alleged to have been suffered by Eobert Lee Ingram when he was struck and killed by an automobile driven by Edsel Sauve. The accident occurred April 27, 1939, and service was obtained on April 28, 1939. On June 5, 1939, Joe Ingram was appointed administrator of Eobert Lee Ingram’s estate. On July 3,1939, the defendant filed a demurrer alleging a defect in parties plaintiff, the appointment of the administrator and plaintiff’s incapacity to maintain the suit. Thereafter the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex parte JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  2. State ex rel. Arkansas Industrial Co. v. NeelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  3. McConnell v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Davie v. PadgettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  5. Howell v. TodhunterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Berry v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry., Thompson v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  3. Schrum ex rel. Gaither v. BoldingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Lewis v. ShacklefordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  5. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API