Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ewing v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 5, 2003No. 01-6978Published

1Dissent

Justice Breyer,

with whom Justice Stevens, Justice Souter, and Justice Ginsburg join, dissenting.

The constitutional question is whether the “three strikes” sentence imposed by California upon repeat-offender Gary Ewing is “grossly disproportionate” to his crime. Ante, at 14, 30-31 (plurality opinion). The sentence amounts to a real prison term of at least 25 years. The sentence-triggering criminal conduct consists of the theft of three golf clubs priced at a total of $1,197. See ante, at 18. The offender has a criminal history that includes four felony convictions arising out of three separate…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API