Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Speiser, Krause & Madole, P.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 1988No. 54312PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDyke, J.
Appellant law firm Friedman & Chenette Co., L.P.A. appeals from the trial court’s orders quashing service of process and dismissing the complaint on the grounds that the court lacked jurisdiction over the person of appellee law firm Speiser, Krause & Madole, P.C. (“SKM”), a New York professional corporation. The trial court had conducted a hearing where it accepted evidence by way of affidavits, depositions and oral testimony.
The facts giving rise to the filing of this lawsuit have their beginnings near St. Croix of the United States Virgin Islands. In June 1980, a United States Navy…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Giachetti v. HolmesOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sherry v. Geissler U. Pehr GmbhOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Krutowsky v. SimonsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ashton Park Apartments, Ltd. v. LeborDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- Dahlhausen v. AldredOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- National Court Reporters v. Strandberg Associates, 92035 (5-14-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.