Legal Opinion
King v. Commercial Finance Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 20, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
In a fifteen day motion plaintiff seeks to recover on this negotiable note:
“$1,000
Roanoke, Va., July 9, 1929.
“On or before November 1, 1929, for value received I promise to pay to Commercial Finance Company, Inc., or order without offset, negotiable and payable at its office at Roanoke, Va.,
“One Thousand & no/........................Dollars with six per cent interest from April 7, 1928.
“Homestead and all other exemptions waived by maker and each endorser. If this note is not paid at maturity, and is collected by suit or attorney, the maker and endorsers hereof agree to pay, in addition to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Martin v. South Salem Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- Slaughter v. SmitherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
- Title Insurance v. HowellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
- Citizens National Bank v. WaltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Martin's Ex'x v. Lewis' Ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1878
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stanley Clayman and Melvin Clayman v. Goodman Properties, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Huffman v. LandesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Hogg v. Long Fence Co.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 2000
- Stanley Clayman and Melvin Clayman v. Goodman Properties, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974