Legal Opinion

Norris v. Norris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1984No. 57466PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice:

The parties in this case, appellee Pamela Norris and appellant Robert M. Norris, were divorced by decree of the trial court entered October 10,1979. Both parties had agreed to the terms of the divorce decree prior to its approval by the trial court. That portion of the decree giving rise to the present controversy provided:

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED BY THE Court that plaintiff [appellee] be, and she is hereby, ordered and directed to pay that certain indebtedness owed to Mast-ercharge, holding defendant [appellant] free and harmless from the payment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phillips v. HA Marr Grocery CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. Lemons v. LemonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Potter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Huchteman v. HuchtemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Womack v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Stork v. StorkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API