Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Downer Towing Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 26, 1926No. 251PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The court below seems to have held that there “was no satisfactory proof that the items of repairs shown on the (repair) bill were necessitated by the collision,” and commissioner and court certainly held that said repair bill “was not shown to be correct in accordance with the rule in The Spica (C. C. A.) 289 F. 436,” and for that reason also rejected it.
It is quite true that the proof offered was not like that discussed in The Spiea, and it is just as true that this ease presents wholly different legal conditions. In The Spiea, libelant was suing on a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Susquehanna S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Navigazione Generale Italiana v. TimminsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- The ArpillaoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- The WestchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- The Elmer A. KeelerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- The President MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- The Gylfe v. The TrujilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Agricultural Cooperative Ass'n v. the DennyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Dowling v. Isthmian S.S. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Theothilatos v. Martin Marine Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.