Legal Opinion

Wulschner v. Ward

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1888No. 13,253PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, C. J.

Complaint in two paragraphs by Albert O. Ward against Emil Wulschner for the rescission of a contract for the sale of a piano, and for damages.

The first paragraph charged that the plaintiff was induced to purchase a piano from the defendant by representations that it was sound in every particular, perfect in tone, and free from blemishes and defects of every kind, upon which he relied, but that said representations were false, as the defendant well knew at the time they were made ; that after discovering certain defects in the piano, which such false representations gave assurance did not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cook v. ChurchmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Arrington v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
  3. Marsh v. LowIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Hoover v. SidenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Burnett & Co. v. Blackmar & ChandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hadley v. KaysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. United Mining Co. v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Miller Jewelry Co. v. DicksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Keeney v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  5. Purity Maid Products Co. v. American Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API