Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 27, 1940No. 8939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

Upon a re-examination of the record and a careful consideration of appellants’ motion for a rehearing, we have concluded that the motion should be granted. To prevent unnecessarily encumbering the published reports, we are withdrawing the former opinion written herein, and substitute this in its stead.

This suit was by Robert Hughes, independent executor of the estate of Mrs. Emma Cornell, deceased, owner of and upon certain vendor’s lien notes originally executed in 1914 in part payment for 96 acres of land in Irion County, payment of which was subsequently assumed by D. L.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First State Bank & Trust Co. v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. First Nat. Bank of Marlin v. DupuyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Fenimore v. Youngs and MinorTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Willis Bro. v. Pinkard, AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Bellah v. DennisTexas Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. HessTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. City of Nashville v. DrakeTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hughes v. HessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Miller v. CreeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Grayco Town Lake Investment 2007 LP v. Coinmach Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API