Legal Opinion
State v. Morgan
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 27, 2016No. S-1-SC-36047; Docket 33,840PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANISEE, Judge.
{1} Defendant appeals his conviction for child solicitation by electronic device, in violation of NMSA 1978, Section 30-37-3.2 (2007). Defendant makes two arguments: (1) Defendant’s attorney was constitutionally ineffective by not advising him that pleading no contest to the charge before July 1, 2013, would exempt him from registration requirements under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), NMSA 1978, §§ 29-11A-1 through -10 (1995, as amended through 2013); and (2) enforcing SORNA’s registration requirement to child solicitation by electronic…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. VarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jones v. SantiestevanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022
- State v. BegayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. HagerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.