Legal Opinion
Merle Sater, et al. v. Republic Services of Indiana Transportation LLC, et al.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided December 8, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00403Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION MERLE SATER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 3:23-CV-403-CCB REPUBLIC SERVICES OF INDIANA TRANSPORTATION LLC, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Defendants have moved to exclude the testimony of Plaintiffs’ experts Dr. Rick Wickstrom, Dr. George Shaw, and Sara Ford under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. They have also moved to strike the supplemental affidavits filed by Dr. Wickstrom and Sara Ford as an untimely disclosure under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 and as unhelpful to the jury under Rule of Evidence…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gayton v. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Doris Berry, Personal Representative of the Estate of Lee F. Berry, Jr., Deceased v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Mark A. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- S. Gopalratnam v. ABC Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.