Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hill

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 15, 1975No. 50654 to 50656PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

These are post conviction habeas corpus proceedings. See Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P., and Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824 (Tex.Cr.App.1967).

Hill was convicted after a jury trial for the offense of robbery; the jury assessed punishment at imprisonment for 5 years.

Martinez was convicted after a jury trial for the offense of sale of marihuana; the court assessed punishment at imprisonment for 5 years.

McDaniel entered a plea of guilty before a jury and was convicted for the offense of sale of marihuana; the jury set punishment at imprisonment for 7 years.

Each petitioner is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Steel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Ex Parte RaleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mercado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Ewing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Hunnicutt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Hargett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API