Legal Opinion
St. Marie & Son, Inc. v. Hartz Mountain Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 3, 1976No. 4-75-Civ-638PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
In this lawsuit brought under federal and state antitrust laws, two motions are presently pending: Defendant Hartz Mountain Corporation moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings as to its counterclaim, and Sabin Segal moves for his dismissal as a defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim against him upon which relief can be granted.
Defendant Hartz Mountain Corporation is a manufacturer and marketer in the small pet and pet supply business. Defendant Sabin…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Kelly v. KosugaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Armstrong v. SnyderDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984
- Rust v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of WisconsinDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1989