Legal Opinion
McNally v. Yarnall
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 13, 1991No. 90 Civ. 3076 (RWS)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Sean and Janet McNally (the “McNallys” or “McNally”) have moved pursuant to Rule 15(a) Fed.R.Civ.P. for leave to amend their complaint in their defamation action against James Yarnall (“Yarnall”) to include as a defendant Yarnall’s lawyer Peter R. Stern (“Stern”), and the law firm of Berger & Steingut, based on certain allegedly libelous statements made by Stern. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
THE PARTIES
The McNallys are residents of the State of New Jersey, and, for the past fourteen years, have been engaged in the purchase and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Williams v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- John R. FREEMAN, Appellant, v. MARINE MIDLAND BANK-NEW YORK, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Ford v. LevinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Branca v. MayeshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Aguirre v. Best Care Agency, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Byrd v. AbateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Seils v. Rochester City School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- Fine v. ESPN, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2014
- Conte v. Newsday, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.