Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Quick

California Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1912No. S.F. No. 5889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. Thomas J. Lennon, Judge presiding at trial. J. J. Van Nostrand, Judge denying new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

On November 3, 1905, the parties entered into a contract whereby the plaintiff, as contractor, agreed to construct for the defendant, as owner, a seven-story brick building upon a lot fronting on Seventh Street, in the city and county of San Francisco. The contract price was $45,927, payable in installments, as the work progressed.

Construction was commenced and continued until April 18, 1906, when the earthquake and fire which occurred on that day partially destroyed the work done and the materials furnished by plaintiff under the contract. There had then been paid to plaintiff the first…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Russell v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Ahlgren v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Corder v. McDougallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Stock v. ThieleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API