Legal Opinion

Adams v. Thompson

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1974No. 1435PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Defendants, sellers, appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, broker. We reverse.

Plaintiff and defendants entered into an exclusive listing agreement for six months commencing on March 15, 1972 and providing for a 5% real estate commission and a tax of 4% on said commission. The trial court found as facts that:

“4. The written listing of plaintiff expired by its terms on September 15, 1972. Following expiration of the listing, an extension of the listing was sought by plaintiff. No written extension of the listing was made. Defendant Roy Thompson verbally authorized…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Frederick v. Younger Van LinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Novak v. DowNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Pitek v. McGuireNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Tsosie v. Foundation Reserve Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. McLain v. HaleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. United Southwest National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Peterson v. PetersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Smith v. GalioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Gonzalez v. GonzalezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Kelly v. HodgesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API