Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 18, 1994No. Nos. 92-1532, 93-1665, 93-1672 and 93-1673PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion PER CURIAM.

2Per curiam

Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc. (AEC) moves for leave to intervene in these proceedings concerning the antitrust conditions included in the operating licenses for two nuclear power plants. Because AEC has no economic relationship to the power plants and because AEC’s concern about the precedential effect of an adverse decision is not *1516sufficient to confer standing, we deny the motion for leave to intervene.

I

Ohio Edison Company, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, and Toledo Edison Company are part owners of the Perry and Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plants. In 1987 and…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Southern Christian Leadership Conference v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aurora Loan Services, Inc. v. Frank Craddieth and Peggy Craddieth, Appeal Of: Midwest Real Estate Investment Company, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Ruiz v. EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. City of Chicago v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. City of Cleveland, Ohio v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Ohio Edison Company, Toledo Edison Company, City of Brook Park, Ohio, Intervenors. Ohio Edison Company v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, City of Cleveland, Ohio, Intervenor. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and the Toledo Edison Company v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, City of Cleveland, Ohio, Intervenor. City of Cleveland, Ohio v. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. Aurora Loan Serv v. Craddieth, FrankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API