Campaign for Accountability v. Consumer Credit Research Found.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
NAHMIAS, Justice.
*843In this case, the Court of Appeals held, based on its reading of this Court's decision in Bowers v. Shelton, 265 Ga. 247, 453 S.E.2d 741 (1995), that Georgia's Open Records Act prohibits the disclosure of all information that is not required to be disclosed based on the ORA exemptions listed in OCGA § 50-18-72 (a). See Consumer Credit Research Found. v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. System of Georgia, 341 Ga. App. 323, 329, 800 S.E.2d 24 (2017). We granted a writ of certiorari to address that issue, and as explained below, we now disapprove the Court of Appeals' broad reading…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berryhill v. Georgia Community Support & Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Griffin-Spalding County Hospital Authority v. Radio Station WKEUSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Undisclosed LLC v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Smith v. Northside Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Harris v. Cox Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gray v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Kinslow v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Gonzalez v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
- Consumer Credit Research Foundation v. Board of Regents of the University System of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Khalia, Inc. v. Daniel RosebudCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.