Legal Opinion

Undisclosed LLC v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 30, 2017No. S17A1061PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Alexander Hamilton famously observed in Federalist 78 that courts “have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment.” Notwithstanding this general principle, the Georgia Constitution does confer on us some carefully defined room for the exercise of will: it vests in this Court the power to approve rules for each class of court in this State. That is a policymaking power. We can approve or disapprove a proposed rule based on whether we think it’s a good idea. But once we’ve approved a rule, our policymaking role is at an end and Hamilton’s observation applies with full force.…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. McBurney v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. Seals v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  3. City of Guyton v. BarrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  4. SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS v. HENRY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  5. MONDY v. MAGNOLIA ADVANCED MATERIALS, INCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API