Legal Opinion

State v. . Rhyne

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

INDICTMENT for embezzlement under § 1014 of The Code, tried before Graves, J., at Pall Term, 1891, of Gaston Superior Courl. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

The State offered as a witness a clerk in the store of the prosecutors, who testified that on one occasion, when he went to dinner, there was a two dollar bill in the cash drawer; that when he left the store the defendant was .the only clerk left there, and that when witness returned from dinner the two dollar bill was gone. On cross-examination, this witness was asked if he inquired of defendant upon his return to the store what had become of the two dollar bill, and if defendant gave any explanation. The evidence on objection was ruled out, and defendant excepted. There was much…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . McNairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. State v. . WhitfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. State v. . HildrethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849
  4. State v. . BrandonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1862
  5. Knight v. . KillebrewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burnett v. Wilmington, Newbern & Norfolk Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. State v. LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. State v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Newbern v. . HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. . NevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API