State v. Cassady
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentJustice Long
“[J]ust as ‘a defendant is entitled to an instruction as to any recognized defense for which there exists evidence sufficient for a reasonable jury to find in his favor[, so has a] parallel rule ... been applied in the context of a lesser[-]included[-]offense instruction.’ ” State v. Sloane, 111 N.J. 293, 303, 544 A.2d 826 (1988) (omission and second alteration in original) (quoting Mathews v. United States, 485 U.S. 58, 63, 108 S.Ct. 883, 887, 99 L.Ed.2d 54, 61 (1988)). Under our law, a criminal defendant need only scale a “low threshold” to avail himself of a jury charge on a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. Crisantos (Arriagas)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- State v. SavageSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- State v. MauricioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- State v. PurnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.