Legal Opinion
United States v. Certain Real Property & Premises known as 4003-4005 Fifth Avenue
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 27, 1994No. 92-CV-0961 (TCP)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PLATT, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for an Order of this Court granting summary judgment in this civil forfeiture proceeding under 21 U.S.C. § 881 and 18 U.S.C. § 981(a). The government contends that no claimant maintains any legal interest in the property superior to the government and without knowledge of the narcotics activity on the property and therefore summary judgment is appropriate. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment must be granted.
Background
Juan Antonio…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. DaccarettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Bertram L. PodellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Certain Real Property and Premises Known as 38 Whalers Cove Drive, Babylon, New York, Edward J. Levin, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Certain Real Property & Premises Known as: 4003-4005 5th Ave.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Certain Real Property and Premises Known AsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ConstantinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013