White v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Presiding Judge.
This proceeding apparently involves appeals from three convictions for aggravated robbery, wherein the punishment assessed was twenty (20) years.
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed an appellate brief in which he concluded that the appeals are frivolous and wholly without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1973), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969), as interpreted in Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Cr.App.1974). A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Currie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Savant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Clemons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- English v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Drake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.