Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Marstelle

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1946No. Civ. 15300PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

By her amended complaint, containing two causes of action and filed herein, plaintiff alleged in her first cause of action that she was the owner of certain described improved real property in the city of Los Angeles; that on or about February 10, 1940, she “permitted the defendant to occupy ... an apartment located over a garage” on the real property here in question; “said premises to be held and possessed by defendant for a period of two years without rental”; and that as a condition precedent to said tenancy “defendant voluntarily agreed to install plumbing, etc., in said premises and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stoner v. ZuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Emerson v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Benjamin Moore & Co. v. O'GradyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Dean v. BrowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Guerra v. PackardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Lee v. North Dakota Park ServiceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Miller v. Desilu Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Korry of California v. LefkowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Lusk v. KrejciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API