Legal Opinion

Hoza v. Hoza

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1982No. 981PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Presently before the court is the appeal of William A. Hoza from the order of the lower court, dated September 3, 1980, wherein the preliminary objections of appellee, Thomas Turnbull, were sustained and appellant’s complaint against Turnbull dismissed. 1

For the reason that we feel that the lower court abused its discretion in failing to grant appellant leave to amend his complaint, we reverse and remand.

On October 12, 1979, appellant and Thomas E. Hoza entered into an agreement which provided:

This agreement made the 12th day of October, 1979 by and between Thomas E. Hoza and William A. Hoza.

W…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Otto v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Harkins v. ZamichieliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Otto v. American Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Western Pennsylvania National Bank v. BradishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kern v. KernSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Pennfield Corp. v. Meadow Valley Electric, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. D'Angelo v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In re D'Angelo)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Pence v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Mansour v. Gnaden Huetten Memorial Hospital, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API