In re Fifteenth Ave. Extension
California Supreme Court
Appeals from the County Court of the City and County of San .Francisco. Motion to Dismiss Appeals,
1Opinion of the Court
Department No. 1, Mr. Justice McKinstry, presiding:
The judgment was, in fact, entered February 8th, 1878, and the notice of. appeal filed and served within the year prescribed by statute. The circumstance that the order was made nunc pro tunc, cannot affect the question. We all agree that the notice.of appeal was served within a year after-the entry of the judgment.
Mr. Crittenden.—“ My next point is, that there was no notice of appeal served in this case.”
Mr. Mullaney.—“ I have here an affidavit of the serving of the notice of appeal by delivering it to the cleric at the office of the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Stutsman v. SharplessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Washoe Copper Co. v. HickeyMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Coon v. Grand Lodge of the United Order of Honor of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Banfield v. SchuldermanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Ward v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.