Legal Opinion

Davis v. City of Palestine

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 27, 1997No. 12-95-00180-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOLCOMB, Justice.

Harold Davis and Patricia Ann Davis (“Davis”) sued the City of Palestine (“the City”) pursuant to Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 101.001 et seq., commonly known as the Texas Tort Claims Act (“the Act”), for damages to their business property. They also alleged an unconstitutional taking of that property. The trial court rendered summary judgment in favor of the City. On appeal, Davis contends that summary judgment was improper because he stated a cause of action under the Act, sovereign immunity did not protect the City, and the City failed to meet its summary judgment…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Palestine v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API