Legal Opinion

Willis v. Paul

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1931No. Docket No. 8052PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

From the completed record herein it appears that following the recovery of a judgment by plain tiff from the defendant, the giving by the former to the latter of a notice of its entry, and the issuance of an execution on such judgment, 'the defendant gave notice to the plaintiff of his intention to move for a new trial, which latter motion having duly come on for hearing, was by the court denied. In the meantime, and by means of several separate, consecutive orders secured by the defendant from the trial court, by which the execution of the judgment was stayed, the plaintiff was prevented…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hill v. FinniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Nonpareil Manufacturing Co. v. McCartneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Segarini v. BargagliottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Foster v. FernandesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Williams v. BorgwardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kim v. ChinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Guardianship of MorroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API