Legal Opinion

Kim v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 30, 1998No. 05-96-00985-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WHITTINGTON, Justice.

Tammy Kim appeals a summary judgment granted in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”). In a single point of error, Kim claims the trial judge erred in granting summary judgment that State Farm was entitled to offset payments due her under an uninsured/under-insured motorist (“UM”) insurance clause with payments previously made to her under a personal injury protection (“PIP”) insurance clause. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

BACKGROUND

On November 14, 1994, Kim was injured when a car driven by Jose Hernandez ran a red light and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Gaines v. HammanTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Barnett v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Texas v. KiddTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Grimes v. Andrews, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  3. Smith v. Altman, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  4. Green v. Morris, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  5. Bomar v. Walls Regional Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API